A colleague made a referral to one of my daily obsessions that had me checking out the site sooner then I had planned. Penny Arcade had an interesting topic for it’s latest comic depicting images construed from the video imbedded in this post (entitled “Moral Combat”). While I found the comic (as always) quite hilarious, I was quite disconcerted by the video.
Basically, the premise of video is to display how video games are the cause of everything from the World Trade Center terrorist attacks to the Columbine shootings. It displays children as mindless automatons who have free access to very mature video game content that fills their empty heads with a very numb view of violence, the knowledge of how to utilize weapons for violent behavior, and a desire to use this knowledge on the people around them. I find irony in the absence of any reference to parents, parenting, or parental control.
This, however, is not my primary reason for posting, but is what prompted a conversation that I had later that afternoon with another of my colleagues which focused more on the general affect of Technology on today’s society. While he did not convey any from of agreement for the overbearing, nonfactual Moral Combat video, he did pose a rather convincing argument on the negative affects that technology is having on society.
The basic premise of his argument focused on how, technology has begun to weaken our culture on a physical and social level. Being that I have based a career in Technology this was not an idea that I was going to accept easily. However, brining up legitimate examples such as the growing obesity of our children and a growing trend of people whose primary social experiences are found in online communities, he began to catch my attention a bit. While the ideas he expressed are a far cry from calling video games the bane of our existence, I found myself compelled to agree that today’s generation feels less connected to their local community. The world has grown smaller, making the feeling of anonymity stronger and sense of individualism less distinct. An interesting question was posed: who is the Einstein, Beethoven, Picasso, or Franklin of today? When I try to answer this question, I think of entrepreneurs…the Bill Gates and Donald Trumps, but I cannot think of anyone who has made such an astounding mark on society to be named with those listed above. I do not believe that this is because those great minds don’t exist, but that these individuals have to fight a society that rewards anonymity as the technology that the society survives on works best when things conform to a standard.
Maybe the technology that helps society survive is also a bane. Maybe…but that thought is not going to stop me from expressing it via this technological medium.


5 Comments:
Thought provoking, Mike. I agree with you that technology has very negative side effects. I can't say I believe it weakens our culture or erodes individualism. Quite the opposite, I say! Of course, I'll have to present my argument later as I have but a few minutes left of my work day and also need to put a little more thought into what I'll say to you.
Heh, looking forward to another enriching debate. *hugs*
BTW, I loved the dramatic music to that video... I mean, really, I should by angry, but the whole overtone made me bust out laughing!
One interesting thought...there are many stories that explore the dangers of AI rebelling against humans (Terminator, Matrix, I Robot to name a few main-stream ones) but what I find more thought provoking is the idea of it not...what happens when we become so dependent on AI that we are on the verge of succumbing to it willingly? Now that would make a good story!
Honestly, as much as I enjoy all the movies you mentioned (though I never saw I, Robot) I think the enslavement by strong A.I. hype is over blown. I would imagine that any strong A.I. would be largely indifferent too our species. I would hope, as long as we respect them, we could co-exist nicely. Also, we may not have too worry about succumbing to them willingly, but could be faced with the dilemma of either merging our minds and bodies with our creations or remain unable to take part of or keep up with the future because human ability may reach its limit.
See Technological Singularity.
An interesting read. Thanks for the link!
It will be interesting to see just how much of the personality of the person/people who finally push the technology past that barrier actually is transferred to the technology...just think of how differently things could be between an influence of someone like Beethoven, Einstein, Picasso, Marx, or Hitler. Each, it seems, could create a completely different future reality.
Post a Comment
<< Home